UK Scientist Reveals Bombshell Data Analysis: Tracks Batches Of Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen, Finds “..Some Batches Are 50 Times Worse Than Others”

Editor: Craig Paardekoope’s work clearly demonstrates that Big Pharma is brazenly issuing a cocktail of different CoVID Jabs testing them on humans. Since not every batch is the same then what are the varying ingredients? Also, why are creatures like Fauci claiming all these jabs are “safe and effective” especially given some are obviously placebos and others a variety of mystery cocktails? Recall that in October this was the statement of an expert FDA panelist that colluded with Pfizer to inject 5 -11 year old children with the Clot Shot:

“We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it.”

Update: Data on lot sizes is slowly being dragged out of Pfizer. Check here for the initial 33 batches analyzed by lot size and adverse reactions. Some batches are 3 to 4 times more dangerous than others.

App “How Bad Is My Batch?” Allows People To Input Batch Code And See How Many Deaths, Disabilities and Illnesses Associated With That Batch “1 in 200 Lots Contain Deadly Ingredients”

By Celia Farber, Substack December 17, 2021

“ I’m following the very important work of Craig Paardekooper at Kingston University London.  Recently, I introduced Craig’s work to our email group. 

Three of his conclusions:The companies purposely manufactured non-uniform formulations of their vaccines while representing to the public that all COVID-19 vaccines from a given manufacturer were uniform in their formulation.

Over 20,000 different batches (lots) of Pfizer, Moderna, J & J injections total. 

1 in 200 lots contain deadly ingredients. He urged me to watch a series of videos, in which he lays out the unthinkable.

How Bad is My Batch:

via Craig Paardekooper Bitchute Channel

“Please share with those you know, and also with doctors, nurses and teachers – who may soon be pushing the vax onto children. Doctors and nurses need to see that some batches are 50 x worse than others – before they prescribe them.”


—Craig Paardekooper, Telegram

How Bad Is My Batch?” App and website here.

“Moderna Used the Alphabet to Label Different Toxicities of Vaccine

Moderna batches belong to two main groups – 20A or 21A – the 20A group is much more toxic. In fact all of the batches producing more than 1780 adverse reaction reports – all of those batches have batch codes ending in 20A.”

“I ranked all the Moderna vaccine batches in order of the number of deaths caused, and used the data from the highest 180 batches as my data set.

As shown in my previous videos, Moderna batches have an alphabet letter in the centre of their batch codes…”


—Craig Paardekooper

I called Dave Rasnick, just now.

How did you find this guy? I asked.

”I just stumbled upon it,” he said. “Every morning I spend an hour or two going to the usual places, I go to, to find information. Last week or something I came across one of his talks. Odyssey or something. And then found his website. He had done a series of videos. These analyses are of the US VAERS data. That’s available to anybody. There are huge number of reports in VAERS. What he has done is that …the guy must have a lot of time on his hands because VAERS is a pain in the ass to use normally. There’s almost a million reports now on the Covid injections….from this guy I learned there are 20,200 batches. That includes all 3— Pfizer, Moderna, and Janssen. He has done an analysis by batch number. One batch has about 20,000 jabs. There are 20,200 lots numbers. We know there are billions of these already ordered and shipped. The important thing is that it’s a huge data base. He has correlated over time the reports of the severity of the jabs over almost a year now.”

Dr. Rasnick described how Paardekooper charted a roller coaster of adverse events patterns, not random, but highly variable. They went up and down, forming patterns.

“He was able to show that they had done a dosing regimen where the earliest ones had highest toxicity, some a lot less toxic…This is exactly what any scientist wants to see, this volume of data. These companies are working in concert so they did not interfere with each other’s results. The toxicities are very specific, and they come sequentially.”

”All of that non-randomness was the key. As soon as you see that… if I was on a jury I wold convict those people of grievous bodily harm and willful homicide.”

I asked what he knew about Paardekooper.

“He’s not a PhD yet,” Dr. Rasnick said. “He’s at Kingston University, in London. We’ve had exchanges, he answers my emails promptly. He reminds me of….well, he’s not beholden to anybody. I knew something like that could be done if somebody had all that data. It’s a huge, extraordinary effort. If it was only a few thousand data points that would be one thing, anybody could do that, but this is about a million data points. Batch codes and toxicity. The December 4th video, (below) that’s the one that shows coordination.”

Batch Codes and Toxicity

The purpose of this study was to determine if there is any significant variation in batch toxicity – by counting the number of adverse reaction reports associated with each batch number.

The number of adverse reactions in each State of the USA caused by each individual batch was also counted.

The results were interesting.

70% of the batches were harmless – producing only one adverse reaction report each.

80% of the batches produced only 1 or 2 adverse reaction reports. So the vast majority of the batches were harmless.

However, a very distinct and significant anomaly appeared.

1 in 200 (0.5%) of the batches was found to be between 1000 and 5000 times more toxic than the average batch, and accounted for 70% of all of the adverse reactions, and 70% of all of the deaths

1 in 20 (5%) of the batches accounted for 90% of the adverse reactions and deaths.

These toxic batches consistently produced high levels of adverse reactions, disability and death across every State in the USA, in sharp contrast to the harmless batches. As a consequence the toxic batches are easily visible as a string of numbers across the screen in the video above.

The consistency with which these batches produce adverse reactions indicates that the adverse reactions are caused by the batches rather than by the health status of the recipients.

The probable reason for these more toxic batches is either

1. The batches contain added ingredients that are highly toxic

2. The batches are of a higher concentration of the same ingredients

The later suggests that Pharma may be investigating the LD50 (Lethal Dose) in order to establish the therapeutic range. Needless to say, such experimentation carried out on human beings has already resulted in deaths and disabilities – as shown in this report.

The question arises –

If there is such high variation in the toxicity of the batches, should we be mandating this medical intervention?

Should we be coercing people under threat of losing their job or being confined at home , into taking something where death or disability is a possible adverse reaction?

Craig Paardekooper

Craig-Paardekooper’s bitchute channel here.

You may also like...

5 Responses

  1. Wayne Fred Petitto says:

    Are the batches all the same size, all been distributed already, etc.?
    I do not see the number of people given each batch, so how can we determine the % of adverse effects and deaths per capita?
    I would think that is of great importance. i.e. if there are 50 deaths from a batch that has been given to 100,000 people that is better than 25 deaths from a batch that has been given to only 10,000 people.
    Also when were these batches created & administered? Do they appear to be getting less toxic, or more toxic over the months?
    I may have missed something.

    • Editor says:

      Quote: “there are 20,200 batches. That includes all 3— Pfizer, Moderna, and Janssen. He has done an analysis by batch number. One batch has about 20,000 jabs. There are 20,200 lots numbers. We know there are billions of these already ordered and shipped. The important thing is that it’s a huge data base. He has correlated over time the reports of the severity of the jabs over almost a year now.”

  2. Don says:

    Has anyone reviewed the analysis and concurred?

    • Editor says:

      Dr Carrie Madej has mentioned similar analysis has been done by others using different databases. Unfortunately there were no show notes (Stew Peters Show) so I haven’t found a link yet and haven’t really looked. But it’s a reasonable question.

  3. jed says:

    are the bottle doses numbered 1, 2 and 3 ‘clearly seperated’ within statistical analitic results anywhere. Given that bottle number 1 is the Placebo (saline solution), [of which recipients still recieved the ‘vaccine cert pass’ and so on where number 3 bottle would be the MRNA (so called – vaccine trial drug)?

Leave a Reply to Don Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll Up